A&E/Projects

From Robbie McClintock
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Based on Robert McClintock’s writings, the distinction between a life project and a pedagogical project is the difference between an existential condition (what a human being is) and a methodological tool (how a student studies). However, McClintock views them as deeply intertwined: the pedagogical project is the specific vehicle through which the student learns to manage the broader, overarching project of their own life.

1. The Life Project: Existential and Ontological

McClintock derives his concept of the life project largely from the philosophy of José Ortega y Gasset. In this view, a human being does not have a static nature, but rather a history and a future that must be invented.

  • Definition: The life project is the "irremediable project for a particular existence". It is the program of life that a person invents for themselves in light of their specific circumstances. We do not simply exist; we "live by making choices" that determine who we become.
  • Eros and Daimon: McClintock describes the internal generation of this project as a dialogue between two forces. Eros is the "great yea-sayer" that fills the person with "endless projects"—from scratching an ear to writing a book. The Daimon is the critical inner voice (judgment/conscience) that vets these impulses. The life project emerges from the interplay of Eros proposing possibilities and the Daimon selecting which to pursue.
  • Self-Formation: The life project is the mechanism of formative justice. It is the continuous process where a person answers the question: "What can and should I make of myself?". This project morphs continuously as the self interacts with circumstances, but it maintains a morphological continuity.
  • Destiny vs. Fate: McClintock distinguishes this project from "fate." A life project is a "necessary potential," but the individual is free to fail at it or to falsify their life by refusing to undertake it. To be a "hero" in the Ortegan sense is to be a person who strives to be themselves by fulfilling their specific project.

2. The Pedagogical Project: Methodological and Instrumental

The pedagogical project is McClintock’s proposed unit of educational activity, designed to replace the "lesson" which dominated the era of the textbook.

  • Definition: A pedagogical project is a sustained intellectual engagement where students are given a "charge" (a task or problem) and must mobilize resources ("the field") and intellectual strategies ("the tools") to construct a solution or product.
  • The Shift from Lesson to Project: McClintock argues that the "lesson" is an artifact of print culture (scarcity of information). In a digital environment of information abundance, the "lesson loses its pertinence". The project is the "hearty mongrel" of the new digital environment, capable of thriving where students face more information than they can memorize.
  • Components:
    • The Charge: A concrete, unambiguous task that energizes the student.
    • The Field: The unbounded resources (digital libraries, databases) available to solve the problem.
    • The Tools: The disciplinary methods used to manipulate the field (e.g., statistical analysis, historical criticism).
  • Authenticity: Pedagogical projects should be "constructivist," meaning the student is actively doing something (solving a puzzle, making a product) rather than passively receiving instruction. Examples include Project Galileo (doing astronomy) or Archaeotype (simulated excavation).

3. The Relationship: The Pedagogical Project as Training for the Life Project

McClintock connects these two concepts by arguing that the purpose of education is to empower the student to take command of their life project.

  • The "Assignment" as Bridge: McClintock traces the pedagogical project back to the "Assignment" in the Dalton Plan (1920s). The Assignment was originally a "long-range contract shaped by the student's interest," which allowed the student to "command his own resources". He argues that modern digital projects recover this original vision, allowing students to function as autonomous agents rather than passive consumers of a syllabus.
  • From External to Internal Control: By engaging in pedagogical projects—where they must define goals, manage time, and select resources—students practice the very skills required for their life project. The pedagogical project shifts the student from being a "tourist" collecting knowledge trinkets to a "philosophical explorer" searching for self and community.
  • Preparation for Liberty: Since the life project requires the autonomous allocation of attention and effort (formative justice), the pedagogical project serves as the rehearsal for this liberty. It treats the student as an agent who must "chart our path through our primal ignorance".

In summary, the life project is the existential burden and opportunity of being human (defining who one is), while the pedagogical project is the specific educational structure (charge, field, tools) designed to equip the student with the autonomy and judgment necessary to carry out that life project successfully.