Texts:1971 Man and His Circumstances Annotations: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 <div class="anno" ID="A28">A28</div><div class="annotext">NATORP TAUGHT A VERSION OF IDEALISM THAT PROVOKED ORTEGA (p. 51). The best introductory essay on Natorp is by Ernst Cassirer, "Paul Natorp: 24. Januar 1854-17. August 1924," in <i>Kant-Studien</i>, Band 30, 1925, pp. 273-298. Natorp's conception of civic pedagogy was developed in his <i>Sozialpädagogik: Theorie der Willenserziehung auf der Grundlage der Gemeinschaft</i>, 3rd. ed., 1909; and <i>Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Sozialpädagogik</i>, 2nd. ed., 1922. A closely related work was <i>Sozialidealismus: Neue Richtlinien sozialer Erziehung</i>, 2nd. ed., 1918. Natorp's conception of philosophy is presented on a popular level in his <i>Philosophie: Ihr Problem und ihre Probleme</i>, 2nd. ed., 1918; and on a more systematic level  in <i>Vorlesungen über praktische Philosophie</i>, 1925, and the posthumous <i>Philosophische Systematik</i>, edited by Hans Natorp, 1958. Perhaps Natorp's best known work, and one that is very important for his theory of civic pedagogy and of philosophy, is <i>Platos Ideenlehre: Eine Einführung in den Idealism us</i>, 1903. For a good discussion of Natorp's views, see Heinrich Levy, "Paul Natorp's praktische Philosophie," <i>Kant-Studien</i>, 31, 1926, pp. 311-329.</div>
 <hr>
-<div class="anno" ID="">A29</A29div><div class="annotext">WHAT NATORP PROCLAIMED ABOUT PLATO, KANT, AND PESTALOZZI, ORTEGA RECOGNIZED IN FlCHTE, RENAN, AND NIETZSCHE (p. 52). The last three authors were the ones Ortega most frequently referred to in his early writings and his letters of the time. See "Cartas inéditas a Navarro Ledesma," <i>Cuadernos</i>, November 1961, pp. 3-18; "'El sobre hombre," 1908, <i>Obras</i> I pp. 91-5; "La teología de Renan," 1910, and "Renan," 1909, <i>Obras</i> I, pp. 133-6, 443-467; and in "Asamblea para el progreso de las ciencias," 1908, <i>Obras</i> I, p. 108, the lament that nowhere in Spain were the works of Fichte available. Natorp made only scattered references to these men, although their work could be viewed as civic pedagogy.</div>
+<div class="anno" ID="A29">A29</div><div class="annotext">WHAT NATORP PROCLAIMED ABOUT PLATO, KANT, AND PESTALOZZI, ORTEGA RECOGNIZED IN FlCHTE, RENAN, AND NIETZSCHE (p. 52). The last three authors were the ones Ortega most frequently referred to in his early writings and his letters of the time. See "Cartas inéditas a Navarro Ledesma," <i>Cuadernos</i>, November 1961, pp. 3-18; "'El sobre hombre," 1908, <i>Obras</i> I pp. 91-5; "La teología de Renan," 1910, and "Renan," 1909, <i>Obras</i> I, pp. 133-6, 443-467; and in "Asamblea para el progreso de las ciencias," 1908, <i>Obras</i> I, p. 108, the lament that nowhere in Spain were the works of Fichte available. Natorp made only scattered references to these men, although their work could be viewed as civic pedagogy.</div>
 <hr>
 <div class="anno" ID="A30">A30</div><div class="annotext">AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL THEORISTS HAVE FORGOTTEN NATORP (p. 52). In 1900, a short review by Arthur Allin of the first edition of Natorp's <i>Sozialpädagogik</i> appeared in the <i>Educational Review</i>, Vol. 19, March 1900, pp. 290-295. A more substantial essay, "Paul Natorp's Social Pedagogy," by M. W. Meyerhardt was published in <i>The Pedagogical Seminary</i>, Vol. 23, March 1916, pp. 51-62. One of the few other significant pieces on Natorp published in the United States is the short, lucid article by Horace L. Friess, "Paul Natorp," in the <i>Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences</i>, Vol. 11, p. 283. Another excellent review of Natorp' s accomplishments is the translation of an article, "Paul Natorp," by Mariano Campo in <i>The Encyclopedia of Philosophy</i>, Vol. 5, pp. 445-8.</div>